METAR Code
N/A
Weather Symbol
Atmospheric stability is a measure of the atmosphere that determines whether air will rise (unstable), sink (stable) or remain in a neutral state (neutral).
Associated terms coming soon:
Dewpoint, inversion, lake breeze, low-pressure system, mesoscale, orographic lift, tornado, and upslope flow are all terms associated with atmospheric instability that will be coming soon to the Aviation Meteorology Reference.
In meteorology, the atmosphere is often described as “stable” or “unstable”. The degree to which the atmosphere is stable/unstable determines most of the weather phenomena experienced both at the surface and in the upper levels of the atmosphere. Stability is assessed in the atmosphere by looking at how temperature and humidity change with altitude.
In the atmosphere, air that is warmer and more humid (i.e. less dense) than its surroundings will have the tendency to rise until it reaches surroundings of similar density. Air that is cooler and dryer (i.e. denser) than its surroundings, on the other hand, will tend to sink.
The graph on the left is a depiction of an unstable atmosphere, where temperature decreases with height. On the right, the graph depicts a stable atmosphere, where temperature increases with height. A section of the atmosphere where temperature decreases with height (denser air over less dense air, left-hand side graph) is considered unstable, whereas an atmosphere where temperature increases with height is considered stable (less dense air over denser air, right-hand side graph).
Importantly, the atmosphere is never entirely stable or unstable, but made up of several stable and unstable layers, meaning different kinds of vertical motion can occur at different heights.
Image source: Environment and Climate Change Canada
A layer will become more stable as the air parcel becomes colder and drier than the surrounding air. This GIF is an example of a stable, neutral and unstable equilibrium using a balloon, which can be applied to the atmosphere as well. In example 1, the temperature of the parcel of air is warmer than the air surrounding it. It will rise until it reaches air that is equal to or warmer than it. In example 2, the parcel of air is considered “neutral” and doesn’t move. It is the same temperature as the surrounding air. In example 3, the parcel of air is colder than the air surrounding it and sinks.
Stable Atmosphere
A stable atmosphere deters or inhibits vertical motion, that is to say it is an atmosphere where air “sinks” or remains at the “same level” or neutral. A stable layer at the surface (usually referred to as an inversion) often means calm winds and clear skies but can also trap smoke and pollutants in the low levels and prevent them from being dispersed into the upper atmosphere. When humidity is high, this stability can trap moisture near the surface and promote the formation of fog and drizzle.
Unstable Atmosphere
An unstable atmosphere is one that leads to air rising, the formation of convective clouds, precipitation and turbulence. It implies that air in lower levels becomes warmer than the surrounding air, and begins to freely rise. In general, an atmosphere where temperature decreases with height is considered unstable.
Instability will intensify by increasing the temperature or humidity (or both) of the air parcel, with respect to surrounding air.
Image source: Environment and Climate Change Canada
Convective Available Potential Energy, or CAPE is a measure of energy, used to determine how much energy a parcel has to rise through the atmosphere. CAPE is one of the main indicators used in meteorology to predict thunderstorm potential and severity.
This table shows the approximate CAPE values and the corresponding atmospheric instability assessment. If no CAPE exists, the atmosphere is considered stable. As CAPE values increase, the atmosphere is considered increasingly unstable. It is important to note that these values are approximative and should be used in conjunction with other meteorological parameters (such as the presence of CIN, a potential trigger, and wind shear) when assessing the potential for thunderstorm development and their associated hazards.
CAPE is assessed using a tephigram by assessing how a parcel of air would cool and condense as it rises in the atmosphere relative to its surrounding environmental air. A warm, humid air mass at the surface and colder air in the upper atmosphere contributes to more atmospheric CAPE. Additionally, as air becomes cooler and dryer in the upper levels of the atmosphere, or when moisture and heat is added to the lower levels of the atmosphere (for example during peak heating hours on a hot summer day) this adds to CAPE values. Typically, a CAPE value of 1500 J/kg or greater is enough to produce severe thunderstorms in Canada, however general thunderstorms can form with as little as 500 J/kg of CAPE (for more information, NWS explains CAPE visually hereOpen a new window).
Image source: Environment and Climate Change Canada
Convective Inhibition (CIN) works against the buoyancy of a parcel of air in the opposite direction of CAPE, and is in essence “negative CAPE”. CIN can be described as the energy exerted on a parcel of air to decelerate or slow down its rising motion. When assessing thunderstorm potential, the amount of CIN is another indicator to assess potential thunderstorms development.
In this example, we see an atmospheric profile with an inversion in the mid level. Parcel 1 is slightly warmer than the surrounding air and rises to the inversion level (CIN). It does not have enough energy to break through the inversion and overcome the CIN acting on it. Parcel number two is much warmer than the surrounding air and starts to rise. Parcel two has more energy (CAPE) and is able to overcome the inversion level. Once it overcomes the inversion, the air surrounding the parcel is cooler and the parcel accelerates vertically even more and rises into the upper atmosphere. If external forcing (such as a trough in this example) acts upon parcel one, it may be able to overcome the inversion (CIN) if the force is strong enough.
CIN is also assessed via a tephigram by determining when the environmental air is warmer than a parcel of air as it rises through the atmosphere. Often CIN is present when there is an atmospheric inversion in the mid levels, meaning temperature increases with height. A parcel of air that is initially warmer than its surroundings rises from the surface and hits a “ceiling” of warmer air in the mid levels and stops its vertical motion.
When CAPE and CIN coexist, the atmosphere can be considered “conditionally unstable”. This means that while the atmosphere is largely unstable, there is a barrier that air parcels must overcome in order to freely rise beyond a certain height. An external force acting on the air parcel (such as a front/trough, a change in topographical elevation, or additional surface heating) is required to provide the extra energy it needs to overcome this barrier and rise freely.
Image source: Environment and Climate Change Canada
Areas of instability are relatively easy to forecast in most situations by analyzing atmospheric profiles and tephigrams and using scientific reasoning to determine likely areas of instability. Determining exact values of instability is trickier, as they are dependent on the accuracy of the modelled soundings. If the modelled profiles are off even by one degree, it could be the difference between convection developing and a clear sky in situations where convective initiation is suppressed due to an inversion, or the presence of CIN.
In situations where forecasters have assessed that models are not adequately capturing all factors that will affect instability, they must mentally adjust the model output in order to account for those factors. While this typically gives better forecasts, capturing exact details of the forecast is often challenging.
Additionally, there are certain days when the atmosphere is “conditionally unstable” that are difficult to forecast. Typically on these days, both CAPE and CIN are present and forecasting whether there will be enough forcing to overcome the CIN and lead to thunderstorm development is particularly difficult. While this can be observed through upper air soundings (weather balloons), the Canadian observation network is not dense enough geographically or in time in order to see real time atmospheric conditions.
The GFA valid at 1200Z on July 1, 2023 captures the atmospheric instability present that morning across much of Ontario and Quebec. Areas of more organized convective showers are associated with the trough extending from the weak low just southwest of James Bay. This surface trough serves as a trigger for thunderstorms. The effect of the terrain serves as another trigger for thunderstorm development over central-northern Quebec. The orographic lift forces unstable air up and generates isolated thunderstorms over higher terrain.
Atmospheric Instability for surface-based thunderstorms tends to peak late in the day at the cusp of maximum daytime heating. This effect is shown here on the 0000Z GFA from July 2, 2023 with thunderstorms possible across almost the entire GFA area. Their extent of coverage, tops, and potential severity has also increased relative to the 1200Z GFA with tops possible to 42,000ft and hail possible across southern Quebec.
The TAF for CYUL valid between July 1 at 1500Z and July 2 at 1200Z depicts the level of atmospheric instability forecast that day. Convective showers are expected intermittently throughout the forecast period, while a risk of thunderstorms is forecast between the hours of 1500Z and 0300Z. After 0300Z, thunderstorms are no longer in the forecast, which implies that the atmosphere has stabilized and there is no longer enough instability to support thunderstorm development.
12Z Atmospheric Profile
Modeled atmospheric profiles at CYUL from the HRRROpen a new window, valid between 1200Z on July 1 and 0000Z July 2 capture the generalized instability present throughout the day. Simply click through the image carousel to see the various images. At 1200Z on July 1 there is evidence of a cap at the surface (yellow circle), which results in CIN giving stability through the lowest layers of the atmosphere (see science explained section for an explanation of a “cap”). This stability inhibits surface-based convection unless a trigger exists (like orographic lift and/or the trough in this case) that could lift air parcels up into more unstable air where upward motion is supported. This was already on-going as per the GFA and as shown in the various products in the observations section.
Image Source: Pivotal Weather
15Z Atmospheric Profile
As the day progresses, the cap erodes significantly though not completely over CYUL, with dewpoints remaining relatively high and air aloft cooling enough with height to maintain good atmospheric instability. All of this, along with triggers such as the trough, provides continued support for convective showers, towering cumulus, and cumulonimbus. One last important note to make: this is one example of atmospheric profiles over a single point, and these profiles can vary significantly across any given region. Graphic products shown in the strategic charts section display some of this variability.
Image Source: Pivotal Weather
18Z Atmospheric Profile
As the day progresses, the cap erodes significantly though not completely over CYUL, with dewpoints remaining relatively high and air aloft cooling enough with height to maintain good atmospheric instability. All of this, along with triggers such as the trough, provides continued support for convective showers, towering cumulus, and cumulonimbus. One last important note to make: this is one example of atmospheric profiles over a single point, and these profiles can vary significantly across any given region. Graphic products shown in the strategic charts section display some of this variability.
Image Source: Pivotal Weather
21Z Atmospheric Profile
As the day progresses, the cap erodes significantly though not completely over CYUL, with dewpoints remaining relatively high and air aloft cooling enough with height to maintain good atmospheric instability. All of this, along with triggers such as the trough, provides continued support for convective showers, towering cumulus, and cumulonimbus. One last important note to make: this is one example of atmospheric profiles over a single point, and these profiles can vary significantly across any given region. Graphic products shown in the strategic charts section display some of this variability.
Image Source: Pivotal Weather
00Z Atmospheric Profile
As the day progresses, the cap erodes significantly though not completely over CYUL, with dewpoints remaining relatively high and air aloft cooling enough with height to maintain good atmospheric instability. All of this, along with triggers such as the trough, provides continued support for convective showers, towering cumulus, and cumulonimbus. One last important note to make: this is one example of atmospheric profiles over a single point, and these profiles can vary significantly across any given region. Graphic products shown in the strategic charts section display some of this variability.
Image Source: Pivotal Weather
This HRRR model data shows surface-based CAPE and CIN values from 1400Z on July 1 until 0200Z on July 2. Hatched colored lines and grey regions show areas of CIN, whereas those that are solid colors are areas showing CAPE values. These areas of CAPE are areas with atmospheric instability. As seen in the atmospheric profiles, early graphics show large areas of CIN and lower levels of atmospheric instability. As the day progresses into the 1500Z-2300Z time frames, atmospheric instability increases both in geographical coverage across the region and in forecast CAPE values. As the sun sets, daytime heating weakens and atmospheric stability at the lowest layers starts to build in again as surface temperatures decrease and a cap reforms. This results in lower CAPE values and larger areas of CIN, all of which inhibits most thunderstorm development.
Image Source: College of DuPage
An additional trigger that helps enhance atmospheric instability is the presence of one or more shortwave troughs and their associated areas of positive vorticity. These lobes of positive vorticity help provide an environment conducive to thunderstorm development and locally enhance atmospheric instability. Each of these localized areas, when compared to areas of positive CAPE values and location of triggers (ex: trough), are where forecast precipitation and thunderstorms are most likely expected. This is shown in the forecast precipitation on the next graphic.
Image Source: College of DuPage
Forecast model RADAR reflectivity from the HRRR shows expected areas of precipitation and convection. Much of this is organized along the surface trough, though in such an unstable air mass very small triggers like localized surface convergence of air are enough to set off strong vertical motion and thunderstorm development. The strongest and most extensive storm coverage is in late afternoon just before sunset, with storms dying off after 0100Z. Some areas of thunderstorms linger, mainly collocated along the areas where the strongest triggers exist that help maintain atmospheric instability.
Image Source: College of DuPage
Visible satellite imagery for July 1 across southern Ontario and Quebec captures thunderstorms forming across the region throughout the day. Early morning imagery shows the vertical structure of cumulonimbus as the sun’s angle through the atmosphere casts shadows on the western side of the storms north of Montreal. The same occurs at sunset, this time on the eastern side of the storms. Day-long atmospheric instability set the stage for an active thunderstorm day across both provinces.
Image source : CIRAOpen a new window
A single frame of satellite imagery, valid at 1200Z on July 1st, 2023, with red circles indicating the location of thunderstorms across far-eastern Ontario and southern Quebec. Shadows with the morning sunrise can be seen along the western edges of the storms.
Image source : CIRAOpen a new window
Radar imagery captured over a two-and-a-half-hour period, 1030am ET to 1300pm ET shows the extent of active thunderstorms occurring across southern Quebec on the morning of July 1. This convective activity not only continued but also intensified through the afternoon and early evening due to significant atmospheric instability across the area.
Image Source: RADARSCOPE
Observations across the province captured thunderstorm activity and the presence of convective clouds (TCU, CB) throughout the day in this unstable air mass. METARs show high dewpoints, which coupled with triggers (surface trough, shortwave trough aloft, surface convergence, orographic lift) and energy in the atmosphere (CAPE) created an environment of optimal and prolonged atmospheric instability.
Source: OGIMET
Multiple SIGMETs were issued throughout the day on July 1 to reflect large areas of frequent thunderstorm activity. This is one example of an observed SIGMET across southern Quebec that also impacted CYUL operations. The atmospheric instability present at that time supported potentially severe thunderstorms with embedded hail and tops to 45,000ft.
Atmospheric instability is connected to all aviation hazards listed for convective activity, such as turbulence and/or loss/gain of speed. Please see the following terms for more: thunderstorm, squall line, hail, microburst, and tornado.
It is not something we look at as part of our current weather reviews in any detail unless provided by our weather forecaster as information. Both thunderstorms and fog understandably have an impact on our airport operations so anything to help better predict and understand duration is an asset for managing our day of operations and gaining any weather intelligence so we can prepare and react accordingly.
Operations Duty Managers
This term is a "deep dive" into the world of weather and is seen more as a potential red flag or heads up for Operations Duty Managers to reach out to either the FIC or CMACs to get a better idea of what the potential impacts or weather makers are and to develop an operational plan.
In aviation decision space, instability (or lack there of) is a particular dynamic which can cause thunderstorms to develop with little notice (or hinder development if a stable airmass is in place). If the atmosphere is found to be very unstable, then more information is needed to define where and when constraints may occur, i.e. are traffic management initiatives needed?
Instability in the atmosphere is manifested as cumuliform cloud. The greater the instability, the larger and more powerful the cloud will develop. The acronym CAPE refers to the amount of “bang” that a given parcel of air may contain. The acronym CIN refers to the opposite condition – Stability within the atmosphere. Both of these atmospheric indicators may be quantified by analyzing the data on a tephigram.
A tephigram provides a graphical representation of temperatures, humidity and air pressure vertically through the atmosphere above a defined geographical point (this is a simplification, for ease of explanation). There is also another tool called a hodograph, depicting wind velocity changes through the atmosphere, which is used in conjunction with the tephigram. The datum for both of these instruments is derived from the same upper air sounding, and each supports the other with relevant data. For CAPE and CIN Analysis, the tephigram is most relevant here.
FIC
An experienced FSS can glance at the profile depicted on a tephigram and usually be able tell you what kind of airmass it depicts immediately. The specialist can analyse the data to advise a pilot on conditions aloft over the relevant observation point (usually an airport for FSS use, although there are observation points not located on aerodromes). This tool is never used in isolation, but as one component of an multi-step analytical process. Developing a useful and reliable forecast product for a pilot demands that multiple points of measurement/instrumentation are employed, to assure reliability and accuracy of the final product. Think of this as “built-in” safety and quality assurance in FSS procedures.
AAS
Advisory specialists deal solely with the observed development of convective type clouds, and PIREPs. We are in the position of being able to judge convective development over time but deal solely in the current state of the convective development and the trends. We will always include comment about convective development in our advisories, include appropriate remarks in weather observations, and solicit PIREPs to improve the dataset for briefers and forecasters.
Can lead to relative caution in anticipation of a rapid deterioration of the weather according to the advisories issued during the weather briefing. In the end, little impact until the formation of a storm becomes imminent but having the knowledge of what could be expected goes a long way in planning and preparing.
Unstable air is not a frequent topic for ATC. Often, pilots will describe the air as ‘unstable’ which generally tells us that there is turbulence in the area. Sometimes we will receive a weather briefing in which there is a prediction for unstable air with a good chance of thunderstorms during the day. Controllers will be watching for storms but will wait until they arrive before reacting to them.
As a theoretical concept, general aviation (GA) pilots are taught about atmospheric instability and the factors that can contribute to it with respect to the formation of weather phenomena. With the largest focus being put on the lapse rate, specifically environmental lapse rate as well as adiabatic lapse rate and the difference between the lapse rate in dry vs saturated air. However, as a practical concept, not much attention is given to this, because regardless of the level of instability, GA pilots will rely on available weather products and FIC weather briefings to examine the big picture of weather to make decisions regarding their flight.